brianwalker’s posterous

« Back to blog

Key cultural differences in B2B & B2C eCommerce requirements:

I spend a lot of time talking to companies about their eCommerce requirements as they seek solutions that will meet their unique needs. These conversations range from B2B to B2C implementations. I also speak with many technology companies serving these markets.

While the conversations will typically revolve around very tactical and key requirements that separate these (such as payment types, CRM, authentication, catalogs, pricing and bundling rules, etc.), I believe there is a higher level cultural issue evidenced by these conversations.

In a general way this can be captured by the differences between OPEN and CLOSED, though they are a bit more nuanced than that.

What's interesting about this?

More and more conversations with companies looking for B2B solutions are talking about a "retail-like experience". They are looking for B2C look, feel, and features. They are looking to bring B2C marketing and targeting practices to their B2B sites and experience. This requires a significant cultural adjustment. The technology solutions are there, but the implementations, the customer experience design, and the companies policies and procedures will need to change before these goals are realized.

And as we all know, there is a lot of room left for many B2C companies and sites to evolve along this spectrum too. 

I am interested in your comments.

Thanks, Brian

Comments (3)

Jan 07, 2009
mvannorden said...
Two questions that come to mind.
What percentage of companies that have B2B also have B2C offerings? And what percentage of agencies/vendors/shops only do B2B implementations? It seems that agencies who do great ecommerce B2C can bring that branding experience the table. And in some cases do it with existing clients.
Jan 07, 2009
Hi Brian,
This is a great topic and one I've faced a number of times this year. While my focus is B2C, I have had a couple of B2B clients and like you, get B2B inquries. You are right, it's less about technology than about culture....but there are also key differences in the selling cycle, the number of decision makers involved and the negotiated nature of pricing and agreements that make having a "B2C like" e-commerce experience less of a slam dunk than it appears on the surface. That said, I think that some of the B2C best practices and technologies can and should be brought to the table as B2B companies look to improve their online presence. Many have been slow to adapt and are stuck with "brochureware" sites that do more harm than good.
Jan 08, 2009
joliver said...
In my experience, this B2B desire for a "retail-like experience" comes from finally understanding that the end-users of B2B sites are the same end-users as B2C sites, they're just shopping for different products, and as you pointed out Brian, they usually have a more rigid/closed shopping process. The biggest obstacles I've encountered have been organizing product data in a visually appealing way while still getting all the information and specifications across. B2B sites typically have more options for the same product, whether the options are a matter of quantity (each vs pack vs case) or by grades or weights, etc. Typically the B2C options are still relevant too (size, color). Organizing all this information in an appealing yet still functional product page is a feat.

I've also found that the checkout process is dramatically different with B2B sites, particularly when dealing with approval routing, multiple bill-tos and ship-tos on the same account, and tracking spending against grants and spend limits.

The good news is that, from what I've seen, B2B eCommerce is ripe with opportunity and the challenges faced and fixed in this space can bring innovation to eCommerce in the B2C space.

Leave a comment...

 
To leave a comment on this posterous, please login by clicking one of the following.
Posterous-login     Connect     twitter